Latvia detects competition deformation in procurements by local government and its companyChristian Fernsby ▼ | April 6, 2020
The Competition Council of Latvia (the CC) has closed the investigation case regarding activities by two companies – SIA DAKO and SIA RUVAR – in procurements on supply of construction materials, plumbing products and electric appliances, organised by Rēzekne City Council and SIA Rēzeknes Namsaimnieks, owned by the City Council.
Competition Latvia commission
Topics: Latvia competition
In the period from 2013 - 2018, SIA “DAKO” and SIA “RUVAR” participated in procurements organised by Rēzekne City Council and SIA “Rēzeknes Namsaimnieks”, offering prices below their market value for separate items of products in their tenders.
The CC detected that already during fulfilment of the order, mostly these products were not delivered at all, replacing them with products that were not indicated in the technical specification. Whereas the products indicated in tenders were acquired for a higher retail price that did not correspond to the initial offer.
Such manipulation with certain price items allowed both companies to obtain the rights to conclude procurement agreements for an extended period of time. As a result, the other market participants, who submitted tenders corresponding to market prices, had unequal positions compared to these companies.
The CC issued a warning to both companies for such dishonest action.
Technical specifications were prepared formally
The CC also concluded that the customer did not control the conformity of the purchased product prices to the prices indicated in the procurement agreement In fact, the procurements were fictive and did not comply with the aim of their organisation – to select the most beneficial tender of applicants under the conditions of their mutual competition. Consequently, public resources were spent inefficiently.
In addition, the CC detected that for years the items in technical specifications have remained almost the same, which shows that, most likely, needs of each specific customer are not analysed, and technical specifications are prepared formally, using the sample of the preceding procurement regulations.
The CC established that since 2015 SIA “DAKO” and SIA “RUVAR” did not mutually compete in procurements of Rēzekne City Council, as they have established an association of suppliers.
The CC found out that also establishment of this association was a desire of the customer, not an objective necessity of the market participants, because until 2015 both companies were able to fulfil the requirements of procurement regulations separately.
The CC holds a view that Rēzekne City Council and its capital company SIA “Rēzeknes Namsaimnieks” have acted contrary not only to the requirements and the objective of the Public Procurement Law, but also the Law “On Prevention of Squandering of the Financial Resources and Property of a Public Person”, so the CC informed the State Audit Office and VARAM regarding this situation. ■