RSS   Newsletter   Contact   Advertise with us
Post Online Media
Post Online Media Magazine

SEC fines Chinese bank $42 million for mishandling ADRs

Share on Twitter Share on LinkedIn
Christian Fernsby |
America   The practice of “pre-release” allows ADRs to be issued without the deposit

The Securities and Exchange Commission announced that Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Financial Services LLC (ICBCFS), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited, will pay more than $42 million to settle charges for improper handling of “pre-released” American Depositary Receipts (ADRs).

The settlement marks the largest recovery against a broker in the SEC’s ongoing investigation of ADR practices, which thus far has resulted in settlements with 10 financial institutions exceeding $414 million.

ADRs securities that represent foreign shares of a foreign company require a corresponding number of foreign shares to be held in custody at a depositary bank.

The practice of “pre-release” allows ADRs to be issued without the deposit of foreign shares, provided brokers receiving them have an agreement with a depositary bank and the broker or its customer owns the number of foreign shares that corresponds to the number of shares the ADRs represent.

The SEC’s order finds that ICBCFS improperly obtained pre-released ADRs from depositary banks when ICBCFS should have known that neither the firm nor its customers owned the foreign shares needed to support those ADRs.

This inflated the total number of a foreign issuer’s tradeable securities and resulted in abusive practices such as inappropriate short selling and dividend arbitrage.

In certain countries, demand for ADR borrowing increased around dividend record dates, so that certain tax-advantaged borrowers could – through a series of transactions – collect dividends without any corresponding tax withholding.

Pre-released ADRs that were improperly obtained by ICBCFS were used to satisfy that demand.

The SEC’s order finds that ICBCFS violated the antifraud provisions of Section 17(a)(3) of the Securities Act of 1933 and failed reasonably to supervise its securities lending desk personnel.

Without admitting or denying the SEC’s findings, ICBCFS agreed to be censured, return nearly $24 million in ill-gotten gains, and pay $4.4 million in prejudgment interest and a $14.3 million penalty.

The U.S. Department of Justice’s Antitrust Division today separately announced that ICBCFS pled guilty to an antitrust charge relating to the bid-rigging of pre-released ADRs by the same securities lending desk.

What to read next
POST Online Media Contact