RSS   Newsletter   Contact   Advertise with us

Maryland Attorney General Frosh announces $20 million settlement with Wells Fargo

Christian Fernsby ▼ | June 17, 2020
Maryland Attorney General Brian E. Frosh announced that his Securities Division entered into a $20 million settlement with Wells Fargo.
Wells Fargo
Maryland   Wells Fargo
The Consent Order resolves financial crisis-era claims that Wells Fargo misled investors in its issuance of residential mortgage-backed securities (RMBS). The $20 million settlement is the largest reached by a state for Wells Fargo’s financial-crisis era RMBS issuance.

Topics: Maryland Wells Fargo

“Wells Fargo allegedly misrepresented the quality of some of the loans backing its RMBS,” said Attorney General Frosh. “Wells Fargo’s misconduct contributed to the 2008 financial crisis. This settlement will recoup losses that Maryland suffered through Wells Fargo RMBS investments while also providing additional funds for the State.”

Between January 1, 2005 and January 1, 2009, Wells Fargo issued 119 RMBS, the majority containing prime mortgages, with some consisting of Alt-A and subprime mortgage loans. As an issuer, Wells Fargo was required to disclose complete and accurate information about the loans backing its securities. But through two channels, Wells Fargo received information that its disclosures were inaccurate with respect to certain loans.

First, Wells Fargo tested a statistically valid sample of some of its stated income loans and learned that many borrowers’ stated income exceeded the income these borrowers provided to the IRS. Many of Wells Fargo’s RMBS contained stated income loans, and 43 of its deals contained at least one loan with a negative sampling review.

Second, Wells Fargo received information that many of its deals contained loans that did not meet its mortgage origination standards. This information came from due diligence samples commissioned by third-party RMBS underwriters and performed by vendors using information at Wells Fargo’s Frederick, Maryland office. In some cases, around 10% of the sampled loans did not meet these origination criteria.

While Wells Fargo did not securitize the offending loans identified by due diligence, they did not search their mortgage pools to identify and remove other non-complying loans, nor did they revise their disclosures to note that some loans did not meet origination criteria.