No need for Enbridge Energy pipeline overhaul, Minnesota saysStaff Writer | September 12, 2017
Testimony submitted by the Minnesota Department of Commerce suggests there's no need for an expansion of an oil pipeline operated by Enbridge Energy.
Energy Eight different alternatives
Eight different alternatives were outlined. They range from accepting the proposed rebuild of Line 3 as submitted by Enbridge, using other pipelines to carry as much 760,000 barrels of oil per day, or sending additional volumes by trains or trucks.
The project has faced stiff opposition from Minnesota residents. In new testimony sent to the state Public Utilities Commission, the Commerce Department said "it is reasonable to conclude that Minnesota would be better off if Enbridge proposed to cease operations of the existing Line 3, without any new pipeline being built" because of steady demand for refined products in Minnesota and the "serious risks" to the environment.
The Line 3 overhaul is still up for public comment and Enbridge had no public response to the Commerce Department's testimony. In a statement emailed to UPI, Margaret Levin, the state director for the regional chapter of the Sierra Club, said the Public Utilities Commission should consider the new testimony closely.
"At a time when there is no market demand for more tar sands, and Minnesota's oil consumption rates are declining, there's simply no good reason to allow Enbridge to build a dangerous new tar sands pipeline across our state," she said. ■