RSS   Newsletter   Contact   Advertise with us
Post Online Media
Post Online Media Magazine

Scottish Fishermen's Federation against government proposals

Share on Twitter Share on LinkedIn
Staff writer ▼ | January 28, 2016
Scottish Fishermen
Firth of Clyde   Overly restrictive Marine Protected Area

The Scottish Fishermen's Federation (SFF) is urging Scottish parliamentarians to support local communities on the West coast.

SFF calls to rejection Scottish government proposals for an overly restrictive Marine Protected Area (MPA) in the Firth of Clyde.

Following widespread dismay among West coast fishing communities over initial Scottish Government measures on some West coast MPAs in June 2015, which threatened the viability of the fishing fleet, the Scottish Government issued revised proposals for three of them, which then went out for consultation.

However, a notable omission was the South Arran MPA where the initial proposals made by the Government in the summer of 2015 remain unchanged despite significant community opposition over the impact it will have on livelihoods and local economies.

Now, with the Scottish Rural Affairs, Climate Change and Environment Committee due to meet tomorrow (27 January) to decide upon whether to recommend the MPA proposals to Parliament, the SFF is calling on MSPs to put livelihoods and communities before green politicking. MSPs will have the final say on the proposals in a parliamentary vote.

Bertie Armstrong, chief executive of the SFF, said: "We fully support the concept of MPAs and have long campaigned for the need of conservation zones to meet core sustainability and environmental objectives.

"However, the South Arran MPA as it stands goes far beyond what was agreed upon during the initial consultation, which comprised a set of sensible measures that was even approved by the government's own statutory nature adviser, Scottish Natural Heritage, as being the preferred option for meeting the twin objectives of marine conservation and sustainable fishing.

"Instead, we have a purely political decision of an overly restrictive MPA made to appease the green lobby, rather than a common sense management arrangement that would have conserved vulnerable habitats whilst protecting fishing communities at the same time."


What to read next
POST Online Media Contact