RSS   Newsletter   Contact   Advertise with us

20% of seafood samples mislabeled worldwide, says Oceana

Staff Writer | September 9, 2016
Oceana released a new report detailing the global scale of seafood fraud, finding that on average, one in five of more than 25,000 samples of seafood tested worldwide was mislabeled.
Seafood samples
Food quality   82% of the 200 grouper samples were mislabeled
In the report, Oceana reviewed more than 200 published studies from 55 countries, on every continent except for Antarctica. The studies found seafood fraud present in each investigation with only one exception.

The studies reviewed also found seafood mislabeling in every sector of the seafood supply chain: retail, wholesale, distribution, import/export, packaging/processing and landing.

The report comes as ocean leaders from all over the world prepare to gather in Washington, DC for the Our Ocean Conference next week.

“Without tracking all seafood throughout the entire supply chain, consumers will continue to be cheated, hardworking, honest fishermen will be undercut, and the long-term productivity of our oceans will continue to be in jeopardy. It’s clear that seafood fraud respects no borders,” said Oceana senior campaign director Beth Lowell.

The report also highlights recent developments in the European Union to crack down on illegal fishing and improve transparency and accountability in the seafood supply chain.

Following numerous seafood fraud investigations over 12 years, as well as public attention to the problem, overall fraud rates in the EU appear to have decreased from 23 percent in 2011 to a low of 8 percent in 2015.

According to Oceana’s analysis, preliminary data out of the EU suggests that catch documentation, traceability and consumer labeling are feasible and effective at reducing seafood fraud.

In the U.S., studies released since 2014 found an average fraud rate of 28 percent, weighted by sample size.

More than half (58 percent) of the samples substituted for other seafood were a species that pose a health risk to consumers, meaning that consumers could be unwittingly eating fish that could make them sick.

The majority of the studies (65 percent) include clear evidence of an economic motivation for the seafood mislabeling.

Asian catfish, hake and escolar were the three types of fish most commonly substituted worldwide. Specifically, Asian catfish was sold as 18 different types of higher-value fish.

Eighty-two percent of the 200 grouper, perch and swordfish samples tested in Italy were mislabeled, and almost half of the substituted fish were species that are considered threatened with extinction by the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN).

In Brazil, 55 percent of “shark” samples were actually largetooth sawfish, a species considered by the IUCN to be critically endangered and for which trade is prohibited in Brazil.

Ninety-eight percent of the 69 bluefin tuna dishes tested in Brussels restaurants were another species.

A 2015 German study found about half of the samples sold as “sole” to be lower-value fish upon testing.

In 2015, a Santa Monica restaurant and two sushi chefs were charged for selling whale meat, including meat from the endangered sei whale.

The restaurant, which has since closed, had labeled the whale as fatty tuna to hide its true identity when it was shipped to the restaurant in order to sell whale sushi.


 

MORE INSIDE POST